Two plural nouns in a row
--------------------------------------------------
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: A Thousand Exotic Places Looping v001
--
Chapters
00:00 Two Plural Nouns In A Row
00:52 Accepted Answer Score 7
01:57 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#grammaticalnumber
#avk47
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: A Thousand Exotic Places Looping v001
--
Chapters
00:00 Two Plural Nouns In A Row
00:52 Accepted Answer Score 7
01:57 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#grammaticalnumber
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 7
I would use the singular for the first word in most of your examples:
- "component reliabilities"
- "component failures"
- "word combinations"
but
- "systems designers" This is different because the singular form is (or can be) a "systems designer" -- as a job title of someone who designs many systems, for example. "System designer" may be more appropriate if you're talking about a specific system: "This machine is useless. The system designer must have been an idiot".
You're forming a compound noun from 2 nouns, just not a familar one like "bus stop"
Changing the structure can make things better, it's not exactly a matter of word order though: "Component failures tend to release the magic smoke" is good, but "Components' failures tend to annoy their owners" also works. This last example uses the possesive plural (equivalent to "failures of components") and isn't a compound noun.