Is the term "baby kitten" / "baby puppy" superfluous?
Hire the world's top talent on demand or became one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
and get $2,000 discount on your first invoice
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Riding Sky Waves v001
--
Chapters
00:00 Is The Term &Quot;Baby Kitten&Quot; / &Quot;Baby Puppy&Quot; Superfluous?
00:18 Answer 1 Score 7
00:29 Answer 2 Score 3
00:49 Accepted Answer Score 8
01:19 Answer 4 Score 2
01:38 Thank you
--
Full question
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#terminology #taxonomy
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 8
This all depends on context of course, but, generally speaking, the terms baby puppy and baby kitten are neither superfluous nor redundant. The term puppy can be used until a canine becomes full-grown, which can take around a year. If someone told me they had baby puppies or baby kittens for sale, then I'd assume they meant very young animals, maybe only a month or two old; if the animals were more like four or five months old, I'd expect the qualifier baby to be dropped.
ANSWER 2
Score 7
Such apparent superfluity serves to emphasise the youthful nature of the animal in question.
ANSWER 3
Score 3
I suppose it could be said that it was a tautology.
tautology noun : Needless or meaningless repetition in close succession of an idea, statement, or word
But I would say the repetition is useful to emphasise the point that the puppy or kitten was a particularly young one.
ANSWER 4
Score 2
To elaborate on @BarrieEngland's response, I'd say that "baby kitten" will often be used to further heighten the cuteness factor of the fuzzy furball thus described. "Kitten" is cute. "Baby" is cute. "Baby kitten"? Double cute!